Tuesday, February 24, 2009

I Remember







As is my new custom, I looked at Gurney Journey this morning and saw Jim's post about plaster casts. It was enlightening to learn that plaster anatomical casts were called " ecorche". But it was'nt until I scrolled down and saw a plaster cast that my Art Teacher had given me that my past flashed before me this morning. Just like the opening scene from the Italian Movie " Cinema Paradiso" I went back in time and I could smell linseed oil fumes in the air, it was an intoxicant to a young boy of ten.

There have been three principle Men who have shaped me. My father, who loved art, Sam Hyde Harris and Theodore Lukits.




I spent every Saturday for 10 years , beginning when I was ten, learning from Theodore N. Lukits. He built his studio attached to his main house in Los Angeles off of Wilshire Blvd and started the "Lukits Academy". I was schooled in a " Neo Atelier " style atmosphere and mindset. " Neo" in the sense that we did learn from plaster casts but we were taught to go out in Nature and learn from her Moods and to study conditions of Light. The students were taught initially in black and white graphite tonal drawings and then when Ted felt the student ready, he would move on to Still Life Color. His approach was special attention to value and structure. The student was to capture and study the " air between objects". He kept me in black and white for 7 years!




Ted would wax eloquent about Bougereau and Sargent as the greatest examples of Western Art. At a very early age my heroes were Brangwyn, Lord Leighton, WaterHouse, Abbey, Chase, Cecilia Beaux, Anders Zorn , Klimpt, Mucha , Sorolla, Arthur Rackham , Heinreich Kley. Lukits was a virtual talking Art History book. Names that have emerged from obscurity now were household names to me in the 70's.


I became an instant nerd in various ways. While my peers were submerged in Zap Comics, Andy Warhol , Jasper Johns, Wayne Thiebaud et al, I was a young man walking in the 19 th century. I was taught to hate Modern Art. It was subversive and anti-God. It was not legitimate.

Lukits was accomplished as an anatomist ( he had dissected cadavers ) . He assisted Dean CornWell on his L.A. Public Library Murals. Many of the sketches from Cornwell were lying around in his Studio for the students to see. Lukits gained a reputation as an accomplished portrait painter of Hollywood Movie Stars during the late 20's , 30's and 40's. His most famous portrait was of Delores Del Rio.

In many ways he was a second father to me. And would keep me and my Dad after class teaching us about the " Truth" until 11 oclock at night . Many of you have probably never heard of Theodore Lukits. I believe he would be better known today if he did not have a reputation for being a raving anti-semite and white supremecist. He was very much out in the open about his theories. His classes were run with a mixture of culture , politics and Art. It was not unusual to see students come and go who could not handle his diatribes on Race and Art. To him, they were eternally linked.

It has taken me years to recover from all the indoctrination that Ted fed into my young mind. I was convinced that I had talent because I had a percentage of "White" Blood in me. But there is one common phenomena about teen years ...Rebellion. And I rebelled against his teachings and went to Art Center College of Design. It was akin to changing Religions...being born again.




******* The comment below is from Jeremy Elder of "Master of None" Blog http://jeremy-lee-elder.blogspot.com/

The portrait you posted of his wife hangs in my wife's uncle's house. It is so amazing. Every time I am at his house I stare at that painting (and the rest of the family chuckles because I do it every time).

What are the odds of someone in the blogosphere connecting with you and having a personnel link to your past? God is amazing. This is blowing my mind today!!!!!!!!



______


I was bitter towards Ted Lukits for many years. I would never mention his name. In fact, when I got a call from a former student that Ted had died and that he wanted me to come to the Funeral...I refused to go. Such was my bitterness.

But I have learned to forgive him. Its taken many years of self therapy and perspective and Jesus. He was a product of his Austrian Pride. I threw out the baby with the bath water, but his bath water really soiled the baby. But today, we have reassessed great thinkers and artists who held similar beliefs. One that comes to mind is the existentialist Heideggar who wrote the opus " Being and Time ". Many people forgive his Nazi past and focus on his concepts . Even Francis Scaeffer, a Christian Philosopher, quotes Heideggar. In fact today at Berkeley, Prof. Dreyfuss , who is Jewish, in the Philosophy dept says Heidegger is the greatest thinker that bridges Religion and Philosophy. And yet, if Dreyfus lived in Heideggers day, he would have been sent to an oven!





I have learned to understand him yet not EXCUSE him. He taught me many good things. One was " Faith in God and Confidence in Your abilities" . That has served me well. The other is " Know the Truth and the Truth Shall set you free"......yes I am free!





To see his work go here....http://www.theodorelukits.org/



16 comments:

  1. Your post reminds me that we are all such mixed bags of good and bad. It sounds like Lukits was an amazing teacher despite his radical views. It was very generous of him and your father to pour so much into you at a young age (I would love to have had that, or have it even now), but I guess it was a double edged sword that your mind was young and malleable. It seems like these trials have given you great perspective.

    The portrait you posted of his wife hangs in my uncle's house. It is so amazing. Every time I am at his house I stare at that painting (and the rest of the family chuckles because I do it every time). Madeline L'Engle says in her book, "Walking on Water," that all good art is Christian, and all bad art is non-Christian no matter who made it. I think what she means is that God chooses on whom to pour out His blessings of vision and creativity, Christian and non-Christian alike. Those who create beautiful art thanks to His gift glorify Him through the act of creation. I can't help but think of Lukits in that manner. He may have had his bad qualities, but his work speaks such glory.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fiberous post - I enjoyed it - thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jeremy,

    How in the Heavens did your uncle come to own this painting? I remember seeing it in the studio way back when.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for posting this tribute, Frank. I first heard about Lukits from Richard Hescox and Tim Solliday, both brilliant painters who had contact with him. Is it true that he would have you paint under colored lights with colored veils over the casts? I don't know anything about his politics or religion (maybe it's a good thing), but his work speaks for itself.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is it true that he would have you paint under colored lights with colored veils over the casts?

    Yes. He was trying to replicate " Atmospheric conditions". The idea was to paint, lets say a colored vase , under a blue light , covered with a orange veil and have it "Feel" accurate in terms of the characteristics of the elements. The problem that many Lukits students encountered is that ( myself included ) the technical side of painting was elevated above the subject matter. The subject was almost secondary to getting the mood.

    You will see alot of Lukits painting under really bizarre green and red lights. He wanted to prove that you could capture accurate flesh tones under any lighting condition.

    He also claimed in class that he was the greatest portrait artist in the World. Greater than Sargent. He had a VERY healthy ego!

    Thanks for stopping by. This was very cathartic for me. I had to call Tim and tell him I was doing this. There are some who don't want collectors to know about his worldviews.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's actually my wife's uncle. I am not sure how he got it. I can ask him next time I see him. He always tries to hang other art by it, but it doesn't work, because in his words, "she's too beautiful."

    ReplyDelete
  7. Frank - Thank you for sharing this story of your youth with us - I am so touched because you have learned one of the greatest lessons in the world - a lesson that few of us ever learn - that of forgiveness. What a wonderful blessing to your life. It is a real testimony to your character that you were able to get past the indoctrination and reconstruct your belief system.
    Mary

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey Mary,

    Today was real hard. But it was real cathartic. There were actually more incidents with Ted that were really difficult for me...but I learned that I needed to move on. Its so freeing!

    ReplyDelete
  9. [quote]He kept me in black and white for 7 years![/quote]

    That's what kills me. That total linear thinking. I find I learned more from color painting then tonal gradation, and I find I learn more if I'm working on both disciplines at the same time.

    That's why I mention psychological aspects of people. It seems people get so immersed in protocol that they never think about the possibility that maybe there's another way of 'learning' or maybe some people need a little bit more time to get the 'concept'?

    Learning isn't about protocol or being taught in a linear fashion....I believe.

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  10. PN,

    Thoughtful comment. I have lived long enough to see that there is no one way to learn , no one way to teach and no one way to do Art.

    Lukits was an adequate teacher. But in many ways he was a product of the Academy and the rigid standards of Taste for his time.

    I am sure a Psychologist would have had a good time with him!

    As I was talking to Tim Solliday yesterday...We do respect the fact that he was out in the open with his thoughts. I disagree with many of his worldviews , but he was not one of these closet bigots. What you saw was what you got.....kinda like my Blog. I think you all kinda know where I am coming from.

    Courage to state your views and stand by them is so important. To be involved in the public square and to leave yourself vulnerable to criticism is a valuable strengthening tool.

    We have seen a return to Traditional drawing and painting skills being valued. In part as a result of Animation and Gaming. In these industries, there is no value in painting like Jasper Johns.

    ReplyDelete
  11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx1v8pVAf6A
    [quote]I am sure a Psychologist would have had a good time with him![/quote]

    Oh hell, who needs a psychologist? I think you were experiencing a healthy dose of narcissism.
    Control freaks and ego maniacs....screw'm.

    ReplyDelete
  12. PN,

    I just clicked on the link. Thanks! Very thought provoking.

    Case in point. See the portrait of the Woman. That was Lukit's first wife. During the "War " he hoards gasoline . There is an explosion and a fire and subsequently his wife dies in the hospital from burns in the fire. Lukits blamed the " Jewish " doctors who could not save her life . Lukits was badly burned on his hands. Classic Narcissist.

    ReplyDelete
  13. http://liheliso.com/buzz/archive/00000482.htm

    How much of that do you think was just simply being manic? Do you think Lukits was manic? I see correlations with Hogarth's behavior.

    You said he went on diatribes, meaning he took up endless time just spewing out his thoughts.

    I generally don't talk that much, so I always find it fascinating how much 'charisma' plays into being an 'artist'. It seems bravado and intimidation goes a long way in the art world....at least then anyway.

    There seems to be this 'drive' in artists, for better or worse, that people have an affinity towards.......after all, that's what attracted you and your father to Lukits.

    ReplyDelete
  14. He was not manic in my estimation....but most certainly driven. Accomplished is also a quality that gains gravitas.

    ReplyDelete