Andy Warhol , Michelangelo and Whistler personify not just their work but a way of "LOOKING" at the world. The mere mention of their name is descriptive of a movement and thought process.
Darwins " On the Origins of the Species " was published in 1859 and the world has never been the same since. Man no longer was seen as spiritually significant. He was not special . He had no more purpose than a piece of mud sliding down a steep incline. A sunset was no longer a majestic metaphor for God's Glory and promise but a natural collection of photon charged particles emmitting vibrations we call light. I do not find it surprising that Charles Darwin's worldview would also affect Art, especially those artists who wanted to be taken seriously by the Cognocenti.
Bouguereau would be a symbol of dated and stilted Victorian Values. He would be a symbol of Western Culture looking "BACK" at ancient themes that no longer had vitality and "TRUTH". The active word would be that he was an " Anachronism" , like a man gifted at making beautifully crafted buggies while a 18 cylinder Dussenburg rolled by. Bouguereau was at the height of his powers when the World was shaken by Darwin.
I remember doing work for Portal Publications when a competitor "Marcel Schurman " discovered royalty free art that was long since ignored. Bouguereau's work was soon seen on bags , notecards and posters . Soon the buying public was enamored with these beautiful paintings . Pomegranate Publishing soon came out with the Bouguereau Calendar which was a huge success, We are talking mid eighties. I remember an Article in Vanity Fair Magazine where Sylvester Stallone , rich from making another Rocky Film , purchased a Bouguereau because he liked it and soon regretted the acquisition because his ' Art Consultants" thought it was Kitch. He should have hung on to it!

Which brings me to " The Nymphs" at the Haggin. It is a fairly large painting and the reproductions that I have seen online are way too brown. It actually is NOT monotone but is rich with ambers and muted greens set in degrees of Chiaroscurro. If you look at earlier paintings of William's , his tree leaves are greener and as he matures as an artist the greens become more muted and secondary leaving the figures to stand out.

I have always admired his modeling . Is it slick? Is he a "RENDROID?" well , you will have to decide that for yourself as I believe it is a matter of "Taste". But I do feel that his tight approach does lend well to narrative painting , especially when he is illustrating a scene of ancient mythology.

The world was changing around Bouguereau and artists wanted to go outside the environs of the academy and paint what they saw around them. The mere idea of competing for the Prix de Rome was anathema to these artists. Right or wrong , most art innovation is usually a reaction against the standard accepted "Salonese"

I do not find it surprising that an Art Renewal has taken place and that the academy has risen up again like a phoenix. Young and Old artists alike are hungry for knowledge . The teaching method of " just paint what you feel man " is no longer working and is a cliche for mediocrity.
The Rennaissance was a rediscovery of the glory of Rome and its standards and then re- translated to Religious Art themes relevant and alive during this period. We are seein a new rebirth again, Its about time.

Never one to let a good pose get away , B used this pose for ( or vice versa ) two paintings. A man after my own heart!

_______

Its National Bouguereau week!Take a satyr out to lunch. Great post Frank...
ReplyDeleteIn a while crocodile...se you later Satyr!
ReplyDeleteF
Great post Frank. I have always loved Bouguereau. It makes me sad to think that a lot of people let others dictate what good art is to them. It takes the personal-ness out of it. Perhaps the best argument against the modernists is that a lot of "normal" people like Bouguereau, hence why his painting are selling for big bucks on the auction scene now.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, I did my first ever oil painting. It's on my blog. Go over there and tear it apart when you have a free moment.
Jeremy,
ReplyDeletePeople like clubs and always like to be a part of the in crowd. It is hard to be unfashionable.
Hey Frank,
ReplyDeleteWonderful post! Bouguereau is a force of nature. The first time I saw an original Bouguereau, I was in awe. That was 15 years ago, and Ive studied him every since. I read that Bouguereau refused to paint anything other than what made him happy, and that he was not influenced by all the bad in the outside world. He also refused to change his style, no matter what the critics had to say about him.
I think we should all follow Bouguereau's lead and just paint what makes us happy.
Best Jason
Jason,
ReplyDeleteHere Here.
I like the Force of Nature comment. Like him or hate him...he does command our attention at the very least.
Wonderful post my friend.
ReplyDeleteThese paintings are masterpieces!!!!!
Dominic...thanks for stopping by. Love your portraits...
ReplyDelete